1) Protein Protein Interaction group
2) Overall 5
3) Content 6
4) Organization 6
5) Good detail especially by second presenter. Only Xiang's ppt quite
   well organized; Ma's analogy - good    and also some interesting stuff
   on graphs
6) In general badly organized in terms of time, took too long;
   Presentation skills could be improved - don't read off slides, prepare
   in advance

4/28/2003


1. Protein-Protein Interaction Group
2. 9
3. 9
4. 9
5. This is a huge topic and they did a good job covering the major
topics.  I liked their use of illustrations and they had a lot of
links to explore in their ppt presentation.
6. I had a hard time hearing what was said some times and I thought
some of the topics could have been explained a little better.  I would
have also liked to see the presenters take advantage of the computers
in the lab and implement some programs or at least follow some of the
links they presented in their ppt.


III	Group: Protein-Protein interaction
	The overall quality of the group project: 9
	Content: 9   
	Organization: 9
	What we liked most: The coverage of BIND and DIP databases was thorough and well done
What is missing, in our opinion: An explanation of what one does with interaction data, and it would have helped if they have a visualization of what happens when proteins interact structurally. 

1. The name of the group being evaluated: Protein-Protein Interaction Group

2. The oevrall quality of the group project: 8

3. Content: 8

4. Organization: 8

5. what you liked most: good graphics, comparing two databases

6. what is missing in your opinion: not enough context (biology), too much
text per slide,

--------------------
	1. The name of the group being evaluated:  Protein-Protein Interaction

	2. The overall quality of the group project:   10

	3. Content:  9

	4. Organization:  10

	5. what you liked most:  Content, and pictures of the lecture.

	6. what is missing in your opinion: Nothing.


Group 3            Our group
(protein-protein interaction)


IV. The name of the group being evaluated:
	Protein-Protein Interaction
1.The overall quality of the group project: 9
2.Content:     9
3.Organization:     10
4.what you liked most: Protein-Protein Interaction Databases: DIP & BIND

 
 Evaluation for the protein interaction group
  
 1. The name of the group being evaluated:
  protein inetraction 
  
 2. The overall quality of the group project
     1 - 10 (best)
 8
  
 3. Content:
      1 - 10 (best)
 8
  
 4. Organization:
      1 - 10 (best)
 9
  
 5. what you liked most;
 - interaction visualizing tools are really cool
  
 6. what is missing in your opinion
 - More identifying algorithms of protein interaction are needed.
 
 
 -------------------