1) Microarray
2) Overall 8
3) Content 9
4) Organization 6
5) Jim's analogy in his introductory slides was an excellent way to start;
   Excellent detail in some sections; Ben's ppt was well organized with
   ideal level of detail
6) Nihar tried to cram too much in too little time resulting in his
   breezing past his slides; Some base knowledge assumed by some group
   members; Topics were not linked together in a coherent fashion; Some
   topics did not show how a particular technique was actually applied
   to microarrays e.g. clustering techniques. The methods were described
   extensively but not with respect to microarrays

4/24/2003


1. Evaluation Of: MicroArray

2. The overall quality of the group project
     1 - 10 (best):  9

3. Content:
     1 - 10 (best)  9

4. Organization:
     1 - 10 (best)  8

5. what you liked most;
Thorough coverage, clear exposition

6. what is missing in your opinion
nothing really


I	Group: Microarray
	The overall quality of the group project: 9
	Content: 8
	Organization: 9
	What we liked most: The use of examples from literature to illustrate the current use of microarrays. 
     	What is missing, in our opinion: They could have provided a better explanation of the experimental design, and the methods involved in interpreting the results. 

1. The name of the group being evaluated: Microarray Group

2. The oevrall quality of the group project: 7

3. Content: 8

4. Organization: 7

5. what you liked most: introduction and clustering sections

6. what is missing in your opinion: too many lists without expanation, not
enough context (biology), tried to cover too much, some repetition with
Justin Andrews lecture and repition of tools shown

--------------------

1. Evaluation Of: MicroArray

2. The overall quality of the group project
     1 - 10 (best):  9

3. Content:
     1 - 10 (best)  9

4. Organization:
     1 - 10 (best)  8

5. what you liked most;
Thorough coverage, clear exposition

6. what is missing in your opinion
nothing really






Group 2            8.5                    9.0                    8.5
Software and database parts                  none, a little bit too fast
(Microarray)


   Evaluation for the MicroArray group
  
   1.name of group
   MicroArray
  
   2.overall quality
   9
  
   3.content
   9
  
   4.organization
   9
  
   5.liked most:
   -Indepth explanation on experimantal design
  
   6.should have had:
   -More explanation on microarray data analysis
   -Examples of actual data and analysis if any